
still
from animation, "EMPTY", by Chris Landau, 2001

from
page 10 of "The
Flocking Party"
|
In my earlier visual work, “Metacology”, I also explored the idea of evolving systems. “Metacology” was a kind of mythological ecosystem, set in an immeasurably distant future. This project was an odd duck, simultaneously fine art, science fiction, and mythology, which utilized surreal sorts of symbolism. But none of my peers could understand what my symbols meant. I did not even understand parts of it myself, because I was constantly reinventing it. Through my work on “Metacology” I realized that paradigms that help society to survive and to flourish, are ones that need to constantly evolve or adapt. Rather than making a living world fit into a universal mold, a paradigm of life would change with the landscape, constantly adjusting to avoid becoming obsolete. It would make room for invasive species, and even rely upon them. I thought that by creating a visual mythology that I could help develop this sort of paradigm, but the change occurred mostly in myself. My constant reinvention of the surreal species' relationships and symbolism shaped my way of thinking about the world, but I had trouble sharing this change.
A few years ago, after scrapping “Metacology”, my wife checked out a book for me called, “A Thousand Years of Nonlinear History” by the eloquent Manuel DeLanda (DeLanda). I was immediately engaged by the ideas and bought a copy of the book for myself. He retells the last thousands years of human history three times through the lenses of geography, biology, and culture. I soon found that DeLanda was decoding ideas from “A Thousand Plateaus”, a book by Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari (Deleuze). Needless to say, I promptly purchased their book as well, and DeLanda's interpretations catalyzed my digestion of Deleuze and Guattari's protein-rich musings. DeLanda constructed a portable model, much easier to use than their sprawling and rhizomatic “body-without-organs” (Deleuze 149). DeLanda is an expert navigator of their landscape of ideas. He developed a succinct and useful way of interpreting the many different aspects of their work, a map of the territory that he carried around in his head. He grounded their ideas in the current science of complexity and systems theories. But it was the portability of his model that struck me most (Kaplan, Cognition 181). I wondered how I might create such a vivid and accessible model. This was the first step towards conceiving “The Flocking Party”.
|